Immigration Article of the Day: Financial Assimilation by Shayak Sarkar

Kevin R. Johnson

22 Aug 2026 — 1 min read

Financial Assimilation by Shayak Sarkar, California Law Review (Forthcoming, 2026)

Abstract

Immigrants’ lives are measured and debated along many axes: language acquisition, neighborhood choice, and even family formation. But another overlooked form of assimilation persists. I use “financial assimilation” to capture noncitizens’ inclusion within American financial markets, for better or for worse.

The law defines financial assimilation in different ways for different types of migrants. Federal law can tie migrant resettlement to private sponsorship—as Americans’ financial stature supports newcomers—or protect work-authorized noncitizens under financial antidiscrimination laws. Federal law can also deter, if not prohibit, financial assimilation when it limits lending in marquee markets like housing, even as state laws forge a different path. The law offers a far less glossy form of financial assimilation by conditioning detained immigrants’ freedom on financial bonds. Immigration law’s exclusive forces do not preempt financial assimilation.

Beyond defining and describing financial assimilation, this Article uncovers its risks. Financial assimilation generates visibility, and therefore surveillance and immigration enforcement, especially as legal safeguards falter in markets for money transmission and carcerality. I argue that a safer future for financial assimilation is possible, even amid heightened immigration enforcement. Noncitizens and their financial transactions will endure. I propose that private actors and state regulators can protect noncitizens, including by serving as financial guarantors in federal frameworks.

Immigration Article of the Day: Sanctuary and the Data State by Fatma Marouf & Huyen Pham

Sanctuary and the Data State by Fatma Marouf & Huyen Pham, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 126, Forthcoming 2026 Abstract Historically, sanctuary policies focused on protected physical space and limits on police cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—rejecting detainer requests, restricting jail access, and declining formal collaboration agreements. But

In an anti-fraud measure, U.S. government freezes Microsoft, Adobe, Infosys lawful permanent resident applications

Reuters reports (and here) that the Trump administration has frozen some lawful permanent resident filings by Microsoft (MSFT.O), Adobe(ADBE.O) and major IT outsourcers and opened probes into nine top universities, including Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Brown, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Arizona State, and UC

Human Rights Watch: "To Scare People": US Expulsions of Third-Country Nationals to Countries in Africa

From a press release from Human Rights Watch: US: Deportations to African Countries Not Their Own Denied Due Process; Some Returned to Danger in Home Countries * The United States has sent more than 500 people whom it cannot deport to their own countries, because of the danger they would face,

Immigration Article of the Day: Recalibrating the Plenary Power Doctrine After Trump v. Hawaii, Thuraissigiam, and Loper Bright by Abdul Aziz Meslat

Recalibrating the Plenary Power Doctrine After Trump v. Hawaii, Thuraissigiam, and Loper Bright by Abdul Aziz Meslat Abstract This Article reexamines the constitutional foundations and contemporary operation of the plenary power doctrine in U.S. immigration law. For more than a century, the doctrine has afforded Congress and the Executive

Read more

Immigration Article of the Day: Sanctuary and the Data State by Fatma Marouf & Huyen Pham

In an anti-fraud measure, U.S. government freezes Microsoft, Adobe, Infosys lawful permanent resident applications

Human Rights Watch: "To Scare People": US Expulsions of Third-Country Nationals to Countries in Africa

Immigration Article of the Day: Recalibrating the Plenary Power Doctrine After Trump v. Hawaii, Thuraissigiam, and Loper Bright by Abdul Aziz Meslat