Immigration Article of the Day: The Market For Deportation: Private Profits & The Machinery Of Removal by Laura I Appleman

Immigration Article of the Day:  The Market For Deportation: Private Profits & The Machinery Of Removal by Laura I Appleman

The Market For Deportation: Private Profits & The Machinery Of Removal by Laura I Appleman

Abstract


Although legal scholarship has extensively examined the profit-driven architecture of the American carceral state, the rapidly expanding for-profit apparatus embedded within immigration enforcement remains comparatively underexamined. This Article addresses that critical gap, contending that the deep enmeshment of private capital and public authority has transformed contemporary immigration removal into a monetized "market for deportation:" a financially oriented enterprise where the extraction of profit has become a structural feature of the state's power to exclude. Drawing on the Anglo-American history of banishment and forced expulsion, the Article situates modern detention and deportation within a long historical lineage of private actors deriving wealth from the machinery of removal. It then traces the modern expansion of this privatized infrastructure, illustrating how the federal government has outsourced core administrative functions, from facility operation and surveillance technologies to transportation networks to a diffuse web of for-profit entities, all underwritten by public funds. By providing a detailed political economy account, the Article demonstrates how lobbying, campaign contributions, and revolving-door employment have recalibrated immigration priorities to serve market imperatives. Ultimately, these public-private entanglements have produced an expansive deportation economy that prioritizes the demands of private equity and corporate accumulation over legal restraint or basic human rights.

Read more

Immigration Article of the Day:  Administrative Procedural Discretion by Bijal Shah

Immigration Article of the Day: Administrative Procedural Discretion by Bijal Shah

Administrative Procedural Discretion by Bijal Shah, Cornell Law Review forthcoming Abstract The conservative Supreme Court has established maximum presidential control over formal administrative adjudication, despite the resulting impact on independence and expertise in adjudicatory process. Concurrently, a progressive public law perspective advocates for agencies to be released from procedure to

By Kevin R. Johnson